简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
SarahBaker0502 · 2025年11月27日 18:25 UTC
Are both teams using the same packed-case construction and pallet deck? Start there before comparing the fixes.
18分Same case and deck. Packaging shifts the upper cases inward; tooling needs that space for withdrawal.
6分Then put their sections together, including the open fingers, because two individually sensible sketches can still describe a pallet that cannot be built.
24分Could a lower-count layer work with the present tool? Fewer cases is worth comparing, not automatically a failed design.
-2分Anil, yes, with the resulting extra pallet handling included. Sarah's team should compare support and access before ranking capacity.
7分Lower-count option requested. Dispatch wants its partial-order handling included before they'll compare it.
18分Sensible request from dispatch. Does the proposed pattern still make sense when an order stops before a complete layer, or is the diagram quietly assuming every pallet finishes full?
20分Only full layers shown so far. Partial orders are routine here, so that's a real gap.
19分Keep the awkward partial order in the review. A pattern nobody can finish is not saved by looking efficient when full.
23分Who is drawing that partial-order case, Sarah? It needs an owner alongside the full-layer tooling comparison.
19分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .