SarahBaker0502 · 27 Nov 2025, 18:25 UTC
Are both teams using the same packed-case construction and pallet deck? Start there before comparing the fixes.
18 pointsSame case and deck. Packaging shifts the upper cases inward; tooling needs that space for withdrawal.
6 pointsThen put their sections together, including the open fingers, because two individually sensible sketches can still describe a pallet that cannot be built.
24 pointsCould a lower-count layer work with the present tool? Fewer cases is worth comparing, not automatically a failed design.
-2 pointsAnil, yes, with the resulting extra pallet handling included. Sarah's team should compare support and access before ranking capacity.
7 pointsLower-count option requested. Dispatch wants its partial-order handling included before they'll compare it.
18 pointsSensible request from dispatch. Does the proposed pattern still make sense when an order stops before a complete layer, or is the diagram quietly assuming every pallet finishes full?
20 pointsOnly full layers shown so far. Partial orders are routine here, so that's a real gap.
19 pointsKeep the awkward partial order in the review. A pattern nobody can finish is not saved by looking efficient when full.
23 pointsWho is drawing that partial-order case, Sarah? It needs an owner alongside the full-layer tooling comparison.
19 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .