简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
GraceArcher0407 · 2026年1月2日 07:18 UTC
Get the ordinary wait condition from the program owner and match its history to that occurrence. Include the fitted carrier and its actual state, with enough lead-in to see what changed
6分Matched history is back. The fitted carrier's seated input drops before the wait. Earlier footage shows the carrier move slightly as the tray is loaded. Maintenance has the carrier reference and clip.
-1分Does that happen with one tray, or with different trays on the same carrier?
12分Two identified trays on that carrier. Same job version in both captures. Not claiming the trays are interchangeable beyond those observations.
9分Have maintenance compare the intended carrier location and its seated indication with that movement. It gives them somewhere specific to look before another pickup change gets suggested
5分Can a tray look loaded while the carrier itself is short of its intended seat?
7分Yes. Maintenance found the carrier locating stop loose; the tray could look correct from the front while the carrier shifted. They have repaired it and checked the location and indication together.
16分Supervised verification completed with both identified trays. Carrier stayed seated, the input stayed present and the earlier wait did not recur. No pickup correction needed. The repair and checked scope are in the handover.
4分Can the loader see the carrier's correct seat in the revised setup check, Grace? They were looking at the tray before; worth making that extra distinction usable from their side
22分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .