Can't compare these FR10 offers while tray filling is missing

AlexCell · 2025年6月17日 07:49 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AL
AlexCell
I'm costing a boxed-kit loading cell and the cheaper FR10 offer assumes someone presents every box neatly. Our boxes arrive mixed in returnable trays. Where do you put that work in a fair comparison?

9 条回复

BE
BethBell0672
回复 AlexCell

Against the cheaper offer. Labour, space and any presentation fixtures it needs. Has the other supplier included those?

13分
AL
AlexCell

They've included a presentation fixture, but not filling it. So both offers start after the awkward bit, just with different kit in the picture.

20分
BE
BethBell0672
回复 AlexCell

Then give both the same incoming condition. Include empty-tray removal too.

16分
AL
AlexCell

I've added that. Stores already clears the returns at the manual station; I'll check whether the proposed layout blocks that route.

22分
BE
BethBell0672
回复 AlexCell

Also ask who resets the fixture for the next box size. Tool-free adjustment can still take someone's time.

22分
GA
GabrielChen1149
回复 AlexCell

Have you timed someone filling one of those proposed fixtures by hand, Alex, because that might answer the expensive question before either supplier redraws the cell?

18分
AL
AlexCell

Not yet. We can compare a mock-up with the manual station using the same incoming boxes. Need to include the empty returns, as Beth said.

23分
AL
AlexCell
回复 AlexCell

Did the comparison. Sorting and presenting take most of the handling time, so we've asked both suppliers to price that part explicitly. I'm not selecting an arm from the transfer time alone.

9分
BE
BethBell0672
回复 AlexCell

What did stores say about the return-tray route?

22分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .