Our teaching image circles a bright band, while quality's note names an edge nick; how do I repair that reference without losing the real rejection?
Which trim-plate feature should our UR5e reference image actually mark?
SofiaBaker0456 · 2026年3月14日 15:44 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Can quality point out the nick on the retained plate and in a full image? Start with that link, rather than moving the arrow to another plausible mark
14分回复 BethChan1107
Yes, plate retained and nick identified; the old crop excludes that edge completely.
13分Replace the crop with a linked detail and full view. Keep the plate's actual rejection.
17分Does the proposed presentation expose that edge, or was it hidden by the holder before the picture was cropped?
0分回复 BethChan1107
Full original shows it; cropping lost it, not the holder. Corrected page now links both views.
13分Has the tutor replaced the printed page too? Those can outlive the folder correction
14分Printed copy replaced, thanks Fiona; lighting comparison still needs the accepted plate alongside this reject.
24分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .