简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which trim-plate feature should our UR5e reference image actually mark?

SofiaBaker0456 · 2026年3月14日 15:44 UTC

回复讨论
SO
SofiaBaker0456
Our teaching image circles a bright band, while quality's note names an edge nick; how do I repair that reference without losing the real rejection?

7 条回复

BE
BethChan1107

Can quality point out the nick on the retained plate and in a full image? Start with that link, rather than moving the arrow to another plausible mark

14
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Yes, plate retained and nick identified; the old crop excludes that edge completely.

13
FI
FionaChen1195

Replace the crop with a linked detail and full view. Keep the plate's actual rejection.

17
BE
BethChan1107

Does the proposed presentation expose that edge, or was it hidden by the holder before the picture was cropped?

0
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Full original shows it; cropping lost it, not the holder. Corrected page now links both views.

13
FI
FionaChen1195

Has the tutor replaced the printed page too? Those can outlive the folder correction

14
SO
SofiaBaker0456

Printed copy replaced, thanks Fiona; lighting comparison still needs the accepted plate alongside this reject.

24

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。