Our teaching image circles a bright band, while quality's note names an edge nick; how do I repair that reference without losing the real rejection?
Which trim-plate feature should our UR5e reference image actually mark?
SofiaBaker0456 · 14 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC
7 replies
Replying to SofiaBaker0456
Can quality point out the nick on the retained plate and in a full image? Start with that link, rather than moving the arrow to another plausible mark
14pointsReplying to BethChan1107
Yes, plate retained and nick identified; the old crop excludes that edge completely.
13pointsReplying to SofiaBaker0456
Replace the crop with a linked detail and full view. Keep the plate's actual rejection.
17pointsReplying to SofiaBaker0456
Does the proposed presentation expose that edge, or was it hidden by the holder before the picture was cropped?
0pointsReplying to BethChan1107
Full original shows it; cropping lost it, not the holder. Corrected page now links both views.
13pointsReplying to SofiaBaker0456
Has the tutor replaced the printed page too? Those can outlive the folder correction
14pointsReplying to FionaChen1195
Printed copy replaced, thanks Fiona; lighting comparison still needs the accepted plate alongside this reject.
24pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .