SofiaBaker0456 · 14 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC
Can quality point out the nick on the retained plate and in a full image? Start with that link, rather than moving the arrow to another plausible mark
14 pointsYes, plate retained and nick identified; the old crop excludes that edge completely.
13 pointsReplace the crop with a linked detail and full view. Keep the plate's actual rejection.
17 pointsDoes the proposed presentation expose that edge, or was it hidden by the holder before the picture was cropped?
0 pointsFull original shows it; cropping lost it, not the holder. Corrected page now links both views.
13 pointsHas the tutor replaced the printed page too? Those can outlive the folder correction
14 pointsPrinted copy replaced, thanks Fiona; lighting comparison still needs the accepted plate alongside this reject.
24 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.