Which released bracket measurement should our FR5 proposal inherit?

AmyAbbott0032 · 2026年2月26日 00:19 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AM
AmyAbbott0032
I can link the old fit-up and correction notes to individual brackets, but the clamped check measures outside width and the released failure measures hole spacing. Our FR5 proposal treats them as one changing dimension. I want that comparison fixed before anyone buys more restraint for the fixture.

6 条回复

MA
MayaAbbott0040

Keep the two features separate. Ask inspection which drawing revision and support method belongs to each released result. Subtracting unrelated dimensions will not improve the bracket.

5分
AM
AmyAbbott0032

Released check is drawing H, on the identified inspection supports. The clamped outside width was a fit-up note, not the acceptance feature. I've removed the calculated difference from the proposal.

22分
RO
RosaChan1075

Our route once counted the return to inspection as another correction. Does your estimate distinguish the actual correction work from its later check, now the dimensions are separated?

8分
AM
AmyAbbott0032

It does not yet. The fabricator recognises one correction operation, but the worksheet has both correction and inspection-return intervals in the labour total. We are taking observations on the current job instead of deriving work time from those gaps.

4分
MA
MayaAbbott0040

Who owns correcting the existing estimate? The new observations won't repair the copy already with purchasing on their own.

10分
AM
AmyAbbott0032

Estimator has reissued it. Current observations retain first-release hole spacing, one correction where needed, and the separate return result and waiting time. The old width-to-spacing calculation and double labour allowance are gone. Quality and fabrication reviewed the linked examples before purchasing received the replacement.

23分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .