简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which released bracket measurement should our FR5 proposal inherit?

AmyAbbott0032 · 2026年2月26日 00:19 UTC

回复讨论
AM
AmyAbbott0032
I can link the old fit-up and correction notes to individual brackets, but the clamped check measures outside width and the released failure measures hole spacing. Our FR5 proposal treats them as one changing dimension. I want that comparison fixed before anyone buys more restraint for the fixture.

6 条回复

MA
MayaAbbott0040

Keep the two features separate. Ask inspection which drawing revision and support method belongs to each released result. Subtracting unrelated dimensions will not improve the bracket.

5
AM
AmyAbbott0032

Released check is drawing H, on the identified inspection supports. The clamped outside width was a fit-up note, not the acceptance feature. I've removed the calculated difference from the proposal.

22
RO
RosaChan1075

Our route once counted the return to inspection as another correction. Does your estimate distinguish the actual correction work from its later check, now the dimensions are separated?

8
AM
AmyAbbott0032

It does not yet. The fabricator recognises one correction operation, but the worksheet has both correction and inspection-return intervals in the labour total. We are taking observations on the current job instead of deriving work time from those gaps.

4
MA
MayaAbbott0040

Who owns correcting the existing estimate? The new observations won't repair the copy already with purchasing on their own.

10
AM
AmyAbbott0032

Estimator has reissued it. Current observations retain first-release hole spacing, one correction where needed, and the separate return result and waiting time. The old width-to-spacing calculation and double labour allowance are gone. Quality and fabrication reviewed the linked examples before purchasing received the replacement.

23

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。