Tray locator helped until the replacement tray arrived

HarishCarter1011 · 2026年1月14日 16:27 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

HA
HarishCarter1011
The locator stopped our UR5e sleeve tray moving at the bench in the supervised checks, but a replacement tray brought back a missed pickup, so I want to describe the improvement without claiming we have cured every tray problem.

18 条回复

EL
EllaAllen0294

Describe those as two observations. Did the replacement move in the locator, or did it stay put while the pickup missed? The difference matters to what you can reasonably say the locator improved.

1分
HA
HarishCarter1011

It stayed put, Ella, and the sleeve sat off the expected pickup position even though the tray's outside edges were against the stops.

10分
BR
BrunoBarnes0539

Are the pockets in the same positions? Matching the outside doesn't tell you that.

14分
AN
AnnaAbbott0068

Compare the actual locating faces too, because a tray can touch the visible stops while resting on a different underside feature (I've had a moulded rib quietly become the highest point).

1分
ZA
ZaraAdams0134

I'd leave the locator in the improvement note, because otherwise the next person may remove something useful while chasing the replacement tray's different problem.

2分
MO
Morgan_Bailey

Who decides which trays may come back to the bench?

18分
KA
KaiBrown0889

Stores can separate them once someone identifies the difference.

11分
NA
NadiaAllen0291

Stores shouldn't have to discover that difference from a failed pickup

12分
HA
HarishCarter1011

Maintenance checked both trays on the bench, Bruno and Anna: they sit on the intended supports, but the replacement's pocket spacing belongs to our shorter sleeve family, which uses the same outer tray size.

4分
DA
DavidBarnes0606

Then label your comparison with those two tray identities, because an overall size measurement would have made them look interchangeable in my notes too

12分
BR
BrunoBarnes0539

That explains why another pickup nudge would have been a poor cure. Has the short-sleeve tray been taken out of this job's supply?

8分
KA
KaiBrown0889

Nadia, I meant separate known families after maintenance identifies them, not ask stores to diagnose robot misses.

3分
HA
HarishCarter1011

Yes Bruno, and stores found the shared container label was only the outside size; they've separated the families and our trainer is adding the tray identity to the job's changeover check.

0分
AN
AnnaAbbott0068

A different colour can help people spot a mix-up, but I wouldn't make colour the sole identifier if you use it; worn or replaced trays still need a reliable family identification.

21分
EL
EllaAllen0294

Harish, did you get another check with the intended replacement tray? That would let you update the result beyond explaining why the wrong one missed, while keeping the extent of the check clear.

14分
HA
HarishCarter1011

We did: the original tray and two identified replacements completed the supervised comparison without the earlier tray movement or missed pickups, and I have kept their identities with the result rather than saying all trays are sorted.

13分
MO
Morgan_Bailey

Did the relief operator use the new changeover check?

1分
HA
HarishCarter1011

Not yet, Morgan; the trainer did the comparison, so the relief operator's handover is still outstanding, and thanks Ella for making me say which part had actually improved.

8分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .