Describe those as two observations. Did the replacement move in the locator, or did it stay put while the pickup missed? The difference matters to what you can reasonably say the locator improved.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
Tray locator helped until the replacement tray arrived
HarishCarter1011 · 2026年1月14日 16:27 UTC
18 条回复
It stayed put, Ella, and the sleeve sat off the expected pickup position even though the tray's outside edges were against the stops.
10分Are the pockets in the same positions? Matching the outside doesn't tell you that.
14分Compare the actual locating faces too, because a tray can touch the visible stops while resting on a different underside feature (I've had a moulded rib quietly become the highest point).
1分I'd leave the locator in the improvement note, because otherwise the next person may remove something useful while chasing the replacement tray's different problem.
2分Who decides which trays may come back to the bench?
18分Stores can separate them once someone identifies the difference.
11分Stores shouldn't have to discover that difference from a failed pickup
12分Maintenance checked both trays on the bench, Bruno and Anna: they sit on the intended supports, but the replacement's pocket spacing belongs to our shorter sleeve family, which uses the same outer tray size.
4分Then label your comparison with those two tray identities, because an overall size measurement would have made them look interchangeable in my notes too
12分That explains why another pickup nudge would have been a poor cure. Has the short-sleeve tray been taken out of this job's supply?
8分Nadia, I meant separate known families after maintenance identifies them, not ask stores to diagnose robot misses.
3分Yes Bruno, and stores found the shared container label was only the outside size; they've separated the families and our trainer is adding the tray identity to the job's changeover check.
0分A different colour can help people spot a mix-up, but I wouldn't make colour the sole identifier if you use it; worn or replaced trays still need a reliable family identification.
21分Harish, did you get another check with the intended replacement tray? That would let you update the result beyond explaining why the wrong one missed, while keeping the extent of the check clear.
14分We did: the original tray and two identified replacements completed the supervised comparison without the earlier tray movement or missed pickups, and I have kept their identities with the result rather than saying all trays are sorted.
13分Did the relief operator use the new changeover check?
1分Not yet, Morgan; the trainer did the comparison, so the relief operator's handover is still outstanding, and thanks Ella for making me say which part had actually improved.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .