简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
IslaBlair · 2025年11月14日 16:06 UTC
Use the actual packed construction for the support review, with the end supports shown in section. Has packaging seen the difference between the sample and the delivered pack?
15分No. I have sent photos and the packing specification. Empty sample was supplied for size only.
7分Keep that size-only purpose visible on the old sample, so the trainer or tool designer does not later use it as evidence of a successful packed-carton trial.
16分And when the real samples arrive, don't just admire the full stack. Someone still has to feed cartons, deal with a damaged one and finish an interrupted order. Different questions from whether the support works.
12分Lin, agreed, though those work arrangements cannot replace packaging's answer. The revised pattern and the handling proposal should refer to the same packed carton and pallet.
7分Yes, I meant additional work, not a substitute. A useful support check can coexist with an awkward feeding job
3分Who owns updating the operator diagram after a pattern change? The old drawing is already clear enough to be copied, even though it describes the wrong sample construction.
1分Packaging owns the pack reference; integrator owns the pattern and operator diagram. Joint review pending. No revised pattern approved.
8分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .