The layer review uses an empty sample box. Our packed cartons have internal end supports over the gaps.
Which carton base belongs in our UR5e pallet section?
IslaBlair · 2025年11月14日 16:06 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
回复 IslaBlair
Use the actual packed construction for the support review, with the end supports shown in section. Has packaging seen the difference between the sample and the delivered pack?
15分回复 SofiaAli0195
No. I have sent photos and the packing specification. Empty sample was supplied for size only.
7分回复 IslaBlair
Keep that size-only purpose visible on the old sample, so the trainer or tool designer does not later use it as evidence of a successful packed-carton trial.
16分回复 IslaBlair
And when the real samples arrive, don't just admire the full stack. Someone still has to feed cartons, deal with a damaged one and finish an interrupted order. Different questions from whether the support works.
12分Lin, agreed, though those work arrangements cannot replace packaging's answer. The revised pattern and the handling proposal should refer to the same packed carton and pallet.
7分回复 SofiaAli0195
Yes, I meant additional work, not a substitute. A useful support check can coexist with an awkward feeding job
3分回复 IslaBlair
Who owns updating the operator diagram after a pattern change? The old drawing is already clear enough to be copied, even though it describes the wrong sample construction.
1分Packaging owns the pack reference; integrator owns the pattern and operator diagram. Joint review pending. No revised pattern approved.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .