简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Why does our pallet drawing assume a solid top?

SamBrooks0855 · 2025年2月2日 17:49 UTC

已关闭
SA
SamBrooks0855
I'm helping plan a UR5e carton job and have just put an actual empty pallet under the proposed first layer. One carton's centre divider sits directly above a deck gap. The drawing underneath it is a solid rectangle. Can we do a useful low-cost packaging check before paying to develop the robot path?

9 条回复

SA
SarahBaker0502

Yes, start with the actual pallet and packed cartons. Empty boxes won't reproduce the load.

11
SA
SamBrooks0855

Thanks for catching the empty-box issue. We used filled samples with the packing person present. She stopped the build after noticing a base crease over that gap; nothing has been robot-handled yet.

15
SA
SarahBaker0502

That's enough to question the pattern, though it doesn't tell you which replacement pattern works.

14
CA
CallumCarter0969

Did the crease follow the gap when you moved the carton? Or did you only build one arrangement?

6
SA
SarahBaker0502

Useful distinction. Also establish whether that carton was already creased before loading.

8
FA
FarahChan1113

Photograph the underside support with a fresh carton in position before loading it, so you're comparing the real contact areas (a top view hides precisely what matters here).

18
SA
SarahBaker0502

And let packaging decide the trial conditions. No point crushing samples without a question to answer.

11
SA
SamBrooks0855

Only one arrangement so far, Callum. Packaging wants fresh samples and two base positions. I've added the gripper outline to both layouts so we don't approve a carton position the tool can't reach.

16
SA
SarahBaker0502

How did those positions compare? Curious whether the divider location or the existing damage mattered more.

16

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .