I'm helping plan a UR5e carton job and have just put an actual empty pallet under the proposed first layer. One carton's centre divider sits directly above a deck gap. The drawing underneath it is a solid rectangle.
Can we do a useful low-cost packaging check before paying to develop the robot path?
Why does our pallet drawing assume a solid top?
SamBrooks0855 · 2025年2月2日 17:49 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
Yes, start with the actual pallet and packed cartons. Empty boxes won't reproduce the load.
11分Thanks for catching the empty-box issue. We used filled samples with the packing person present. She stopped the build after noticing a base crease over that gap; nothing has been robot-handled yet.
15分That's enough to question the pattern, though it doesn't tell you which replacement pattern works.
14分Did the crease follow the gap when you moved the carton? Or did you only build one arrangement?
6分Useful distinction. Also establish whether that carton was already creased before loading.
8分Photograph the underside support with a fresh carton in position before loading it, so you're comparing the real contact areas (a top view hides precisely what matters here).
18分And let packaging decide the trial conditions. No point crushing samples without a question to answer.
11分Only one arrangement so far, Callum. Packaging wants fresh samples and two base positions. I've added the gripper outline to both layouts so we don't approve a carton position the tool can't reach.
16分How did those positions compare? Curious whether the divider location or the existing damage mattered more.
16分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .