简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Finger channels under the carton support strips

JoBarnes0592 · 2025年11月15日 02:57 UTC

已关闭
JO
JoBarnes0592
I've put the packed carton beside our FR5 pallet section and the rotated layer leaves one stiffened strip over a finger channel. Packaging wants the channel moved; tooling needs it to withdraw. Both drawings look tidy separately.

13 条回复

EL
EllaBarnes0555

Give both teams the same section with the actual strip and finger movement shown. Who owns resolving the clash?

17
JO
JoBarnes0592

Our project engineer owns the layout. He has the two marked drawings but no combined revision yet. The count in the estimate still comes from the original pattern.

18
SO
SofiaChen1152

I'd mark that count provisional now. My review had three drawings with different gaps before we put them together. It was surprisingly easy to think everybody had agreed the same arrangement.

23
AN
AnikaCarter1030

Where is the packing operator in this review? A clever final gap can still be an awkward place to recover a damaged carton.

0
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Anika, useful question, but Jo hasn't said the recovery task yet. The layout needs that task defined rather than an assumed hand reaching into the gap.

15
AN
AnikaCarter1030

Fair. Jo, who handles a damaged carton and where is that done? That's what I should have asked.

-1
HA
HarishBell0663

Is the carton in the section the packed construction you currently receive? Same outside size doesn't always mean the supports inside stayed put. We nearly carried an obsolete assumption through a changeover because the pallet picture was unchanged.

23
JO
JoBarnes0592

Harish, yes, packaging checked our current packed sample. Anika, damaged cartons are removed upstream before pallet loading; the interruption procedure at the pallet still needs defining.

15
SO
SofiaChen1152

Keep those as separate tasks in the review. Upstream rejection doesn't answer what happens if a carton is damaged during placement.

17
JO
JoBarnes0592

Understood, Sofia. I've added that open question rather than describing the upstream check as recovery. The combined section now shows exactly where the channel crosses the strip.

23
HA
HarishBell0663

Thanks for checking the construction. Has tooling offered a different withdrawal arrangement, or is packaging being asked to accept the same gap with a clearer drawing?

16
JO
JoBarnes0592

Two alternatives proposed: changed withdrawal space, or a lower-count layer. Neither approved by packaging yet. The estimate now labels the original count provisional.

4
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Please post which survives the joint review. Including what happens to the interruption task, not only the carton count.

11

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .