long fingers aren't looking like a free fix

JuliaBarnes0587 · 2024年12月16日 23:50 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

JU
JuliaBarnes0587
Longer fingers might get our FR10 concept past the mill door, but I'm not convinced we've solved anything. This is for a teaching workshop, taking finished blanks out of a vice. Has anyone had a layout improve at the fingers and get worse everywhere else?

7 条回复

HA
HassanArcher0356

Yes. Extra offset cleared our doorway and made the withdrawal sweep larger; the doorway was only the first obstacle.

12分
JU
JuliaBarnes0587

That's roughly my worry. Our designer has moved the tool tip in the drawing but kept the old outline behind it. I'll get the complete assembly added.

13分
HA
HassanArcher0356

Include the held blank, cable routing and applicable tool-loading checks; longer fingers are a tooling change, not a drawing correction.

14分
JU
JuliaBarnes0587

Yep, the tooling supplier needs to review it. I'm only comparing spaces with foamboard at present, not making a set of fingers.

11分
HA
HassanArcher0356

Foamboard is useful for exclusion; passing that check does not establish a feasible robot path.

8分
JU
JuliaBarnes0587

The mock-up caught another snag today: our collection tray occupies the proposed exit space. That tray position was inherited from manual loading. We're reconsidering it before the next layout review.

9分
HA
HassanArcher0356

Who refills or removes the tray? Relocating it may simply transfer the obstruction to the operator.

16分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .