简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Carton support direction missing from the FR5 pattern

LucyArcher0393 · 2026年6月11日 11:46 UTC

回复讨论
LU
LucyArcher0393
Our FR5 pallet plan rotates boxes over gaps. Where should I start checking support and finger access together?

20 条回复

ME
MeiBarnes0603

Have you seen the filled carton from underneath, Lucy? The outside dimensions alone won't show where the contents load the base.

8
LU
LucyArcher0393

Yes. The insert carries the product along two sides. Those sides aren't marked outside.

-2
AI
AishaAllen0344

I'd want packaging to mark those load paths on the layer drawing, because otherwise the tooling person may solve a perfectly reasonable problem involving an imaginary box.

13
DA
DavidAllen0345

And find an outside reference. A drawing can know which way the insert faces while the incoming carton gives your station absolutely no clue.

4
ME
MeiBarnes0603

Does the closing process keep the insert orientation consistent with a printed face? Might save adding another mark, provided somebody actually checks that relationship.

12
LU
LucyArcher0393

Not reliably. I've found inserts facing both ways behind the same printed face.

10
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865

We had a similar packaging change nobody considered a handling change. The artwork stayed identical. I'd bring the packing operator into this review; they may know when that choice happens.

11
AI
AishaAllen0344

Could the proposed pattern avoid depending on orientation at all, Lucy, or does the required pallet quantity rule that out before you've compared it?

5
LU
LucyArcher0393

Lower count is possible. Dispatch hasn't agreed to it, but it isn't ruled out.

14
DA
DavidAllen0345

Then draw that version too. Losing a few positions might cost less than teaching every upstream shift a new packaging distinction.

9
ME
MeiBarnes0603

David, I'd still ask packaging about the alternative. Aligned doesn't automatically mean supported, especially near the pallet edges.

11
DA
DavidAllen0345

Agreed on the edge positions. I meant compare the lower-count version, not approve it because the boxes point the same way.

1
LU
LucyArcher0393

Packaging has marked the bearing strips now. Two rotated positions miss them almost entirely.

8
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865

Can the tool designer use that marked drawing for the withdrawal sequence as well? I'd rather not have packaging and tooling each approving a different revision.

3
LU
LucyArcher0393

I've sent that revision. The fingers haven't been checked against neighbouring cartons yet.

1
AI
AishaAllen0344

That neighbouring-carton bit caught us when an empty pallet demonstration looked lovely, then the last placement needed room occupied by everything we'd already placed.

14
ME
MeiBarnes0603

Lucy, are you taking both proposed patterns into that tooling review? Otherwise the cheaper-looking option may simply have fewer details drawn.

11
LU
LucyArcher0393

Both are going. Thanks, Mei; I've added the same tooling envelope to each request.

3
ME
MeiBarnes0603

That should make the comparison easier to read. I'm interested whether the packing team prefers controlling orientation or accepting the lower count.

1
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865

Keep that as their decision until they answer. The insert discovery explains the drawing problem, but it doesn't yet establish which pattern your dispatch area can use.

6

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。