Carton support direction missing from the FR5 pattern

LucyArcher0393 · 11 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC

Reply to discussion
LU
LucyArcher0393
Our FR5 pallet plan rotates boxes over gaps. Where should I start checking support and finger access together?

20 replies

ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Have you seen the filled carton from underneath, Lucy? The outside dimensions alone won't show where the contents load the base.

8 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

Yes. The insert carries the product along two sides. Those sides aren't marked outside.

-2 points
AI
AishaAllen0344
Replying to LucyArcher0393

I'd want packaging to mark those load paths on the layer drawing, because otherwise the tooling person may solve a perfectly reasonable problem involving an imaginary box.

13 points
DA
DavidAllen0345
Replying to LucyArcher0393

And find an outside reference. A drawing can know which way the insert faces while the incoming carton gives your station absolutely no clue.

4 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to DavidAllen0345

Does the closing process keep the insert orientation consistent with a printed face? Might save adding another mark, provided somebody actually checks that relationship.

12 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

Not reliably. I've found inserts facing both ways behind the same printed face.

10 points
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865
Replying to LucyArcher0393

We had a similar packaging change nobody considered a handling change. The artwork stayed identical. I'd bring the packing operator into this review; they may know when that choice happens.

11 points
AI
AishaAllen0344
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Could the proposed pattern avoid depending on orientation at all, Lucy, or does the required pallet quantity rule that out before you've compared it?

5 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to AishaAllen0344

Lower count is possible. Dispatch hasn't agreed to it, but it isn't ruled out.

14 points
DA
DavidAllen0345
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Then draw that version too. Losing a few positions might cost less than teaching every upstream shift a new packaging distinction.

9 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to DavidAllen0345

David, I'd still ask packaging about the alternative. Aligned doesn't automatically mean supported, especially near the pallet edges.

11 points
DA
DavidAllen0345
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

Agreed on the edge positions. I meant compare the lower-count version, not approve it because the boxes point the same way.

1 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Packaging has marked the bearing strips now. Two rotated positions miss them almost entirely.

8 points
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Can the tool designer use that marked drawing for the withdrawal sequence as well? I'd rather not have packaging and tooling each approving a different revision.

3 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to RebeccaBrooks0865

I've sent that revision. The fingers haven't been checked against neighbouring cartons yet.

1 points
AI
AishaAllen0344
Replying to LucyArcher0393

That neighbouring-carton bit caught us when an empty pallet demonstration looked lovely, then the last placement needed room occupied by everything we'd already placed.

14 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Lucy, are you taking both proposed patterns into that tooling review? Otherwise the cheaper-looking option may simply have fewer details drawn.

11 points
LU
LucyArcher0393
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

Both are going. Thanks, Mei; I've added the same tooling envelope to each request.

3 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to LucyArcher0393

That should make the comparison easier to read. I'm interested whether the packing team prefers controlling orientation or accepting the lower count.

1 points
RE
RebeccaBrooks0865
Replying to LucyArcher0393

Keep that as their decision until they answer. The insert discovery explains the drawing problem, but it doesn't yet establish which pattern your dispatch area can use.

6 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.