Have you seen the filled carton from underneath, Lucy? The outside dimensions alone won't show where the contents load the base.
Carton support direction missing from the FR5 pattern
LucyArcher0393 · 11 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC
20 replies
Yes. The insert carries the product along two sides. Those sides aren't marked outside.
-2 pointsI'd want packaging to mark those load paths on the layer drawing, because otherwise the tooling person may solve a perfectly reasonable problem involving an imaginary box.
13 pointsAnd find an outside reference. A drawing can know which way the insert faces while the incoming carton gives your station absolutely no clue.
4 pointsDoes the closing process keep the insert orientation consistent with a printed face? Might save adding another mark, provided somebody actually checks that relationship.
12 pointsNot reliably. I've found inserts facing both ways behind the same printed face.
10 pointsWe had a similar packaging change nobody considered a handling change. The artwork stayed identical. I'd bring the packing operator into this review; they may know when that choice happens.
11 pointsCould the proposed pattern avoid depending on orientation at all, Lucy, or does the required pallet quantity rule that out before you've compared it?
5 pointsLower count is possible. Dispatch hasn't agreed to it, but it isn't ruled out.
14 pointsThen draw that version too. Losing a few positions might cost less than teaching every upstream shift a new packaging distinction.
9 pointsDavid, I'd still ask packaging about the alternative. Aligned doesn't automatically mean supported, especially near the pallet edges.
11 pointsAgreed on the edge positions. I meant compare the lower-count version, not approve it because the boxes point the same way.
1 pointsPackaging has marked the bearing strips now. Two rotated positions miss them almost entirely.
8 pointsCan the tool designer use that marked drawing for the withdrawal sequence as well? I'd rather not have packaging and tooling each approving a different revision.
3 pointsI've sent that revision. The fingers haven't been checked against neighbouring cartons yet.
1 pointsThat neighbouring-carton bit caught us when an empty pallet demonstration looked lovely, then the last placement needed room occupied by everything we'd already placed.
14 pointsLucy, are you taking both proposed patterns into that tooling review? Otherwise the cheaper-looking option may simply have fewer details drawn.
11 pointsBoth are going. Thanks, Mei; I've added the same tooling envelope to each request.
3 pointsThat should make the comparison easier to read. I'm interested whether the packing team prefers controlling orientation or accepting the lower count.
1 pointsKeep that as their decision until they answer. The insert discovery explains the drawing problem, but it doesn't yet establish which pattern your dispatch area can use.
6 pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.