Which FR5 carton pattern survives our remaining old-stock boxes?

EllaBarnes0555 · 2025年11月29日 11:09 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

EL
EllaBarnes0555
Both carton constructions are in the shared support review. Old-stock cutoff still unagreed. I need the pattern comparison to include that overlap, not assume the older boxes disappear before commissioning.

20 条回复

BE
BenBench

Are the two constructions distinguishable when they reach the pallet station?

5分
EL
EllaBarnes0555
回复 BenBench

Different stock codes on incoming cartons. Labels survive to the station. Whether production keeps them separated is not settled.

10分
AM
AmyArcher0380

Who decides that separation rule, and can the person feeding the station actually check it without opening the boxes or calling stores each time?

4分
FE
FelixAdams0110

I'd compare an old-stock route outside the new pattern as well, not force one pattern to solve everything just because purchasing hasn't picked a cutoff

3分
RO
RosaBrooks0814

That option needs the remaining old-stock quantities and expected order mix, otherwise its extra handling can look negligible simply because nobody has counted it.

8分
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Production owns separation, Amy. They can read the codes. Felix, separate old-stock handling is an option; Rosa, remaining quantities are being checked.

17分
BE
BenBench

Has packaging said either construction is supported by the current pattern?

10分
EL
EllaBarnes0555
回复 BenBench

New construction looks promising in the section. No approval yet. Old one has an unsupported bearing area at two rotated positions.

7分
FE
FelixAdams0110

Then there aren't two ready versions of the same plan. Keep the separate old-stock option visible while they work on the new one, without pretending it costs nothing

20分
AM
AmyArcher0380

Felix, and without presenting separate handling as already agreed. Ella still needs production's decision and an understandable changeover instruction for whichever route survives.

19分
FE
FelixAdams0110

Yep, proposed. I'm trying to keep an alternative alive, not volunteer the packer for it

12分
RO
RosaBrooks0814

Could the overlap be limited to identified orders, rather than an open-ended period of mixed stock? That might make the handling comparison easier to estimate without assuming a cutoff already exists.

20分
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Possible. Planner is checking committed orders against the old-stock quantity. I won't invent a tidy end date for them.

18分
BE
BenBench

Does the new construction need different tooling, or only a different layer?

5分
EL
EllaBarnes0555
回复 BenBench

Tooling says existing proposed fingers may work with the new layer. Withdrawal still under review. No accepted tool arrangement for it yet.

14分
AM
AmyArcher0380

Keep that uncertainty in the operator-plan draft. A code check can identify the carton correctly while the selected pattern or finger arrangement is still wrong.

14分
RO
RosaBrooks0814

Production's separation decision should name how returned part-used stock is handled too, since a clear incoming order can become a mixed stack at changeover.

19分
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Planner identified the remaining old-stock orders. Separate handling is being costed for those. New pattern still awaits packaging and withdrawal decisions.

8分
FE
FelixAdams0110

That is at least a finite awkward job now. Have they counted returning leftover boxes too, as Rosa asked?

18分
EL
EllaBarnes0555

Included in the request, not answered. Thanks Rosa for that one. Current comparison still has an open handling cost and an unapproved new pattern.

10分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .