Which FR5 carton pattern survives our remaining old-stock boxes?
EllaBarnes0555 · 29 Nov 2025, 11:09 UTC
20 replies
Are the two constructions distinguishable when they reach the pallet station?
5pointsDifferent stock codes on incoming cartons. Labels survive to the station. Whether production keeps them separated is not settled.
10pointsWho decides that separation rule, and can the person feeding the station actually check it without opening the boxes or calling stores each time?
4pointsI'd compare an old-stock route outside the new pattern as well, not force one pattern to solve everything just because purchasing hasn't picked a cutoff
3pointsThat option needs the remaining old-stock quantities and expected order mix, otherwise its extra handling can look negligible simply because nobody has counted it.
8pointsProduction owns separation, Amy. They can read the codes. Felix, separate old-stock handling is an option; Rosa, remaining quantities are being checked.
17pointsHas packaging said either construction is supported by the current pattern?
10pointsNew construction looks promising in the section. No approval yet. Old one has an unsupported bearing area at two rotated positions.
7pointsThen there aren't two ready versions of the same plan. Keep the separate old-stock option visible while they work on the new one, without pretending it costs nothing
20pointsFelix, and without presenting separate handling as already agreed. Ella still needs production's decision and an understandable changeover instruction for whichever route survives.
19pointsYep, proposed. I'm trying to keep an alternative alive, not volunteer the packer for it
12pointsCould the overlap be limited to identified orders, rather than an open-ended period of mixed stock? That might make the handling comparison easier to estimate without assuming a cutoff already exists.
20pointsPossible. Planner is checking committed orders against the old-stock quantity. I won't invent a tidy end date for them.
18pointsDoes the new construction need different tooling, or only a different layer?
5pointsTooling says existing proposed fingers may work with the new layer. Withdrawal still under review. No accepted tool arrangement for it yet.
14pointsKeep that uncertainty in the operator-plan draft. A code check can identify the carton correctly while the selected pattern or finger arrangement is still wrong.
14pointsProduction's separation decision should name how returned part-used stock is handled too, since a clear incoming order can become a mixed stack at changeover.
19pointsPlanner identified the remaining old-stock orders. Separate handling is being costed for those. New pattern still awaits packaging and withdrawal decisions.
8pointsThat is at least a finite awkward job now. Have they counted returning leftover boxes too, as Rosa asked?
18pointsIncluded in the request, not answered. Thanks Rosa for that one. Current comparison still has an open handling cost and an unapproved new pattern.
10pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .