Seller sent an inspection sheet for the refurbished UR5e we might buy. Every box ticked, equipment identity blank. How should I establish that it describes the offered arm and controller before arranging collection?
The refurbished UR5e inspection sheet has no equipment identity
LeahBell0669 · 2026年3月3日 00:17 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
回复 LeahBell0669
Ask for the inspection scope, findings and tested package identities tied to the offered equipment. Then have a qualified assessor review what was actually checked and what remains outside that work.
16分Seller supplied identities but says the sheet is its standard checklist, not a completed report for this package. No actual findings supplied. I asked for access for an independent pre-purchase assessment.
14分回复 LeahBell0669
Did they agree the permitted checks before you pay for the assessor's visit?
19分Assessor and seller are defining those checks and the package available to inspect. Collection remains unbooked; I am not counting a proposed visit as a condition assessment.
15分回复 LeahBell0669
Has the assessment produced a usable buying decision?
14分Yes. It identified missing package items and repair work excluded from the asking price. The resulting cost no longer suits our fixture-to-tray proposal, so we declined the purchase. We paid for the assessment, not collection.
17分回复 LeahBell0669
Keep that costed reason with the listing. Cheap equipment has a habit of getting rediscovered.
4分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .