LeahBell0669 · 3 Mar 2026, 00:17 UTC
Ask for the inspection scope, findings and tested package identities tied to the offered equipment. Then have a qualified assessor review what was actually checked and what remains outside that work.
16 pointsSeller supplied identities but says the sheet is its standard checklist, not a completed report for this package. No actual findings supplied. I asked for access for an independent pre-purchase assessment.
14 pointsDid they agree the permitted checks before you pay for the assessor's visit?
19 pointsAssessor and seller are defining those checks and the package available to inspect. Collection remains unbooked; I am not counting a proposed visit as a condition assessment.
15 pointsHas the assessment produced a usable buying decision?
14 pointsYes. It identified missing package items and repair work excluded from the asking price. The resulting cost no longer suits our fixture-to-tray proposal, so we declined the purchase. We paid for the assessment, not collection.
17 pointsKeep that costed reason with the listing. Cheap equipment has a habit of getting rediscovered.
4 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .