简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The turned cartons bear on our finger gaps

LeahBrooks0843 · 2026年2月21日 18:40 UTC

已关闭
LE
LeahBrooks0843
Our FR5 layer drawing alternates the packed boxes, but the turned layer loses support under its bearing edges. I want packaging and tooling to settle that together before the pattern becomes the purchase requirement.

21 条回复

CH
ChloeAli0222

Put an actual packed box beside the section first. Which edges carry the load, and what is directly below them in the turned layer? People may be using turn to mean different things

2
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Packaging marked the two long bearing edges. On the turned layer, parts of both bridge the channels left for the fingers. The section shows those gaps; the plan hides them.

23
CH
ChloeAli0222

Then that is the joint question. Closing the gaps may help packaging and trap the tool, so keep its release and exit on the same section

12
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Why alternate at all? Is it required for this box or inherited from a prettier drawing?

16
CH
ChloeAli0222

Could be required, Rebecca. I would ask packaging before throwing out the arrangement.

16
PR
PriyaBennett0742

Include the actual pallet beneath the first layer as well; the support question may differ there even if the repeated layers look identical in plan

17
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Chloe, that's why I asked. I don't know their packing requirement.

12
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Alternation came from the supplier's pattern library, not our packaging instruction. Packaging wants to compare a straight layer before adding a sheet. First-layer support is already drawn on the actual pallet, Priya.

5
TO
TobyAbbott0057

Does the straight layer leave somewhere for the fingers to withdraw after placing the last box, or is only the finished stack drawn?

11
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Only the finished stack so far. I have not seen its placement sequence.

20
TO
TobyAbbott0057

Ask for that before making the straight layer the answer. The last placement is often less generous than the first

21
RE
RebeccaAli0256

And does the straight version reduce the count?

5
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Yes, one box fewer per layer in the sketch we have. Same packed box and pallet.

9
RE
RebeccaAli0256

One fewer may be cheap compared with sheet handling. Depends how many extra pallets it creates, obviously.

8
LE
LeahBrooks0843

I would prefer that tradeoff to another consumable, but dispatch wants the whole-order comparison. We also sometimes stop with an incomplete layer, which the supplier has not drawn.

11
PR
PriyaBennett0742

Keep those incomplete layers in the support review; a satisfactory completed layer does not tell packaging what is carrying the last few boxes in a short order

10
CH
ChloeAli0222

Do you resume those same pallets later, Leah, or are they completed by a different route? That changes what the supplier needs to model

2
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Same pallet can return later. Dispatch has an identified example with a short row left on it. They will join the review rather than send us a description of a typical pallet.

16
RE
RebeccaAli0256

An actual awkward one. Good.

9
LE
LeahBrooks0843

Joint review held. Packaging accepts the straight candidate's proposed support, but tooling found the return to that short row obstructs withdrawal. We have rejected the current continuation sequence, not approved the whole straight pattern.

15

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .