简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Conflicting scratch labels on the faceplate reference set

ChloeBennett0744 · 2026年3月3日 12:46 UTC

回复讨论
CH
ChloeBennett0744
Our proposed FR10 inspection has inherited two faceplate image folders. A bright streak changes position between presentations, and the labels call each position a scratch. I cannot find a record of anyone comparing those labels with the retained physical plates. I would like to repair the reference set before asking the programmer to use it.

5 条回复

JA
JamieBarnes0556

Have quality identify the actual plates and marks beside those captures before changing any thresholds; first check that the two folders even use the same plate identities.

13
CH
ChloeBennett0744

The folders used the same short labels for different plates. Quality has separated them and checked the physical samples. One labelled scratch is a real mark; another has no corresponding defect at the indicated location.

15
JA
JamieBarnes0556

Does the corrected set show that real mark under the proposed presentation, Chloe, or is the image quality still hiding it in some views?

8
CH
ChloeBennett0744

It is still weak in one view. The corrected identity index is now shared with the programmer, and the imaging engineer has the marked plate for a new comparison. We have fixed the file confusion, not the visibility problem.

14
JA
JamieBarnes0556

Keep an accepted plate in that comparison too, so the new arrangement has to show the real mark without inventing another one on the clean example.

24

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。