Our proposed FR10 inspection has inherited two faceplate image folders. A bright streak changes position between presentations, and the labels call each position a scratch. I cannot find a record of anyone comparing those labels with the retained physical plates. I would like to repair the reference set before asking the programmer to use it.
Conflicting scratch labels on the faceplate reference set
ChloeBennett0744 · 2026年3月3日 12:46 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Have quality identify the actual plates and marks beside those captures before changing any thresholds; first check that the two folders even use the same plate identities.
13分The folders used the same short labels for different plates. Quality has separated them and checked the physical samples. One labelled scratch is a real mark; another has no corresponding defect at the indicated location.
15分Does the corrected set show that real mark under the proposed presentation, Chloe, or is the image quality still hiding it in some views?
8分It is still weak in one view. The corrected identity index is now shared with the programmer, and the imaging engineer has the marked plate for a new comparison. We have fixed the file confusion, not the visibility problem.
14分Keep an accepted plate in that comparison too, so the new arrangement has to show the real mark without inventing another one on the clean example.
24分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .