Conflicting scratch labels on the faceplate reference set

ChloeBennett0744 · 3 Mar 2026, 12:46 UTC

Reply to discussion
CH
ChloeBennett0744
Our proposed FR10 inspection has inherited two faceplate image folders. A bright streak changes position between presentations, and the labels call each position a scratch. I cannot find a record of anyone comparing those labels with the retained physical plates. I would like to repair the reference set before asking the programmer to use it.

5 replies

JA
JamieBarnes0556
Replying to ChloeBennett0744

Have quality identify the actual plates and marks beside those captures before changing any thresholds; first check that the two folders even use the same plate identities.

13 points
CH
ChloeBennett0744
Replying to JamieBarnes0556

The folders used the same short labels for different plates. Quality has separated them and checked the physical samples. One labelled scratch is a real mark; another has no corresponding defect at the indicated location.

15 points
JA
JamieBarnes0556
Replying to ChloeBennett0744

Does the corrected set show that real mark under the proposed presentation, Chloe, or is the image quality still hiding it in some views?

8 points
CH
ChloeBennett0744
Replying to JamieBarnes0556

It is still weak in one view. The corrected identity index is now shared with the programmer, and the imaging engineer has the marked plate for a new comparison. We have fixed the file confusion, not the visibility problem.

14 points
JA
JamieBarnes0556
Replying to ChloeBennett0744

Keep an accepted plate in that comparison too, so the new arrangement has to show the real mark without inventing another one on the clean example.

24 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.