Our UR5e inspection examples show the same reflective bezel in two slightly different seats, with bright bands labelled as different scratches. I can still identify the bezel, but no one has recorded a physical appearance decision for it.
I want to stop those arrows becoming the acceptance reference while we sort the holder and lighting. What should the tutor keep from the current images?
Bezel scratch labels that change with the UR5e presentation
JamieAdams0121 · 8 Jan 2026, 17:28 UTC
4 replies
Replying to JamieAdams0121
Keep the originals with their uncertain labels clearly withdrawn from acceptance use; the moving bands are useful diagnostic material, not a reason to teach either scratch claim as fact.
25pointsReplying to HazelBell0658
The tutor has removed the scratch exercise and kept the originals separately. Quality is checking the identified bezel; the holder's repeat seating still needs comparison.
20pointsReplying to JamieAdams0121
Ask quality to retain an accepted example with a strong reflection and a genuinely rejected feature too. On an earlier comparison, making the image quieter also made a faint defect harder to see. You need both sides of that tradeoff visible before choosing the view or tuning thresholds.
17pointsReplying to JamieAdams0121
And name who owns the replacement lesson. Withdrawing the old one helps, but someone still needs to bring the physical decisions and new images back together.
12pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .