FelixAllen0284 · 2 Feb 2026, 08:33 UTC
Give packaging a section through those strips, not another coloured top view
18 pointsDone. They hadn't been given the actual pallet deck spacing. We added that and the packed box section. The turned row is the problem.
7 pointsAsk packaging whether that support condition is acceptable for the packed carton and intended stack. We cannot infer it just from a strip crossing a gap, although it clearly needs their attention.
2 pointsIf an alternative introduces a loose support sheet, please include who places it and where the spare sheets live; that small extra task can end up belonging to whoever happens to walk past.
-3 pointsRebecca, I'd price the pattern without a sheet first. Another item to run out of
21 pointsBoth can be compared. Fewer cartons per pallet also creates work, so it is worth putting the handling cost beside any sheet supply cost rather than assuming one is negligible.
10 pointsAgreed, Bruno, and Felix should have the actual packer review whichever handling tasks those alternatives introduce.
2 pointsPackaging rejected the rotated row for this box. We're comparing fewer cartons in straight rows with a sheet-supported option. Tool supplier has both complete arrangements, including release access. Thanks, Rebecca, sheets weren't even on the operator drawing.
12 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .