YasminBennett0702 · 5 Jul 2025, 07:01 UTC
Which revision did packaging actually approve, Yasmin?
12 pointsThey commented on P5. The wider gaps are in P6. Their note was preliminary, not approval, although the email forwarding it used approved in the subject.
25 pointsThat subject line needs fixing before somebody prints it as permission to build.
6 pointsShow the release positions with the open gripper on P6 too, so the operator review is looking at the same spaces the tool supplier needs.
4 pointsOur tool supplier used the empty gripper width in the pallet file once. Check yours against the jaws actually holding a carton, not just open and shut in free air.
6 pointsA filled case would help that meeting, because our carton ends bulged more than the flat drawing suggested and the gaps looked different with real samples
12 pointsDavid, did the bulge come from the packing or from stacking weight?
18 pointsThe revised email now says P5 preliminary comments, P6 awaiting review. We have filled cartons ready, and tooling is checking the loaded jaw shape as well, thanks Maya.
25 pointsFrom the packing on ours, Hassan, before stacking; the internal bag pushed against the end flap, so changing the pallet pattern would not have removed it
13 pointsPackaging has asked for another layer arrangement with the end supports kept over supported areas. P6 is not going forward. Tooling wants to compare two placement orders for the replacement.
14 pointsAre they keeping one revision owner for that replacement?
21 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .