I watched our coupon total increase without a new inspection. The monitor reconnected while the PLC completion was still high, and counted it again. We aren't clearing that signal or resending work to make the number look right. What should the developer match the retained completion against?
The corresponding inspection attempt and its saved outcome, using the interface's actual identity rules. A high completion bit alone can't tell your monitor whether it already counted that event.
There is an attempt reference beside the bit. The monitor reads it for the detail page but the total increases on every connection where completion is high. Bit of an own goal.
Is the total rebuilt from saved outcomes when the monitor starts, or saved as a separate number? You could fix reconnect and still double it on startup.
We had a report count message arrivals instead of completed items. Looked fine until a connection repeated the same message. I'd keep the message history for diagnosis, but derive the completed total from the reconciled outcomes, not how often they arrive.
Mina, separate saved number. Luis, the developer is changing that to use the outcome records. Liam, our quality lead owns the report correction; I've told planning the current exported total is disputed.
Include an unknown attempt reference in the replay. Don't fix duplicate counting by automatically attaching every unmatched completion to whichever coupon is on screen.
And what if the same valid outcome arrives again after restarting the monitor? Same reference, different connection. That's the test I'd ask to see, not just reconnecting without closing the window.
Mina, yes. Also keep repeated inspection attempts under the coupon. One accepted coupon can legitimately have more than one attempt; collapsing everything to one message per coupon would hide the earlier failure.
The offline tests now replay the retained completion across reconnect and monitor restart. Total stays unchanged. An unknown reference goes into an unresolved list instead of the current coupon. Earlier failed attempts still appear under the accepted coupon.
Yes. Quality reconciled the affected report against the identifiable outcomes and found the repeated completion behind the extra count. Corrected report is ready. We still have the developer's interrupted-save case to finish before installing the change.
The outcome write, Mina. The test interrupts after receiving the result but before that write completes. We need restart to reconcile it without losing it or counting it twice.
And retain that test case after release. The awkward timing is much easier to reproduce in a controlled replay than explain from a planning spreadsheet later.
Yes, Liam, corrected version issued and the earlier export withdrawn. Interrupted-write recovery passed as well: the retained outcome was reconciled once on restart, and replaying it again left the total unchanged. The maintainer installed the change and repeated the read-only monitor checks against the retained result. Thanks all, this one is closed.