JuliaBarnes0587 · 21 Nov 2025, 15:33 UTC
Who owns combining the machine survey with the complete loaded-tool assembly? A collection of separate supplier drawings will not answer the access question.
9 pointsCheck the door position as well as the outline. I've seen a good machine model used with the door in the wrong position, which is a precise drawing of the wrong problem.
9 pointsAnd show the actual grip depth. The blank's centre alone won't define its swept space.
15 pointsIntegrator owns the combined view now. Toolmaker owes the full assembly. Machine owner's survey is booked, and I've asked them to include the operating door position and inside handle.
18 pointsOur proposed trolley turn overlapped the base once the setter looked at it. Include that route while the tool model is coming, unless your layout has no trolley to consider.
20 pointsJulia, does the setter bring a changeover trolley, or carry individual tools? The required route depends on the actual task, not a standard standing-person symbol.
-4 pointsAnd don't park the trolley in the next aisle to make your drawing work.
17 pointsElliot, was a base shift practical on yours, or did you change the trolley route? I'd want both costs visible if either becomes a proposal here.
3 pointsShifted position under comparison, Reece. Not accepted yet. Service panel stays on the drawing too; it was remarkably easy to lose that rectangle in an earlier view.
24 pointsKeep the changeover work in both robot comparisons. A shorter unload time won't compensate automatically for a fixture change that needs the whole bench cleared.
0 pointsHenry, yes, but compare the actual changeover frequency too. I would show the separate tasks and their assumptions rather than hide a rare long change in one average cycle figure.
20 pointsEli, trolley used for jaw sets. Its route is now marked by the setter. Toolmaker has supplied the assembly with one fitting space still provisional; door survey is back. No complete route result yet.
25 pointsDoes that assembly include the held polymer blank at the proposed depth?
18 pointsAisha's frequency point would help maintenance too. We need to know which access is routine and which is occasional, even though both still need a workable arrangement.
2 pointsAda, yes, held position included. Original approach intersects the surveyed handle. Integrator is comparing a different orientation before proposing a base change. Thanks Elliot, the trolley route is already there to compare against.
19 pointsCompare the return too. A different orientation can solve loaded exit and then leave the empty fingers in trouble on the way back. It's still one complete sequence to review.
13 pointsDid the setter see that changed-orientation candidate, Julia, or are their access marks still attached only to the original one?
14 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .