This FR10 housing job also has repeated pickup adjustments and a less-square grip, with the tray only apparently unchanged. I am keeping its evidence separate from the puck enquiry. What should the inspection preserve before anyone changes the physical setup or taught points?
Identify the current housing, tray, tool and program; record source seating before closure, using the approved observation arrangement, then inspect the isolated contacts and attachments before adjusting them.
Current program saved. Housing and tray identified, but one fitted finger has no readable reference. The comparison drawing describes the intended tooling, not necessarily this assembly.
Then photograph and measure the relevant fitted geometry through the maintenance inspection. Missing identification does not itself prove the finger is wrong, but the drawing cannot identify it by wishful thinking.
Stores found a replacement entry but no approved drawing attached. Maintenance is comparing the fitted contact geometry with tooling's requirements. No cause established from the missing record alone.