PriyaBennett0742 · 11 Oct 2025, 10:56 UTC
Quality should judge the identified physical faceplate against the appearance requirement. Keep its images linked to that decision, including any uncertainty while it is being examined.
17 pointsKeep the awkward accepted examples once quality decides too. A set containing only easy clean pictures won't tell you whether normal finish variation is being rejected. The presentation check matters alongside the labels.
5 pointsQuality has taken the actual faceplate for assessment; the current images remain separated from the labelled reference set, and we have not adjusted the threshold.
15 pointsEmma, agreed. Also retain genuine rejected examples; a lighting change that hides everything can look wonderfully consistent on the accepted set alone.
19 pointsExactly. I'd want the accepted reflective piece and an identified faint defect in the same comparison. Not necessarily the same surface version, unless that is the family they're actually qualifying.
14 pointsPriya, has quality decided on that faceplate yet?
19 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .