housing sits straight until our fr5 fingers close

Gavin_Briggs · 13 Mar 2026, 15:57 UTC

Closed
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Our polymer housing looks straight in the tray, then twists as the FR5 fingers close. We've saved too many pickup corrections already. What should I photograph for maintenance before anyone changes another point?

17 replies

NA
NadiaAllen0291
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Both finger contacts and the tray seat. Include the mounting behind them

14points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Is it every housing, or can you keep one that twists beside one that doesn't?

17points
AN
AnikaChan1117
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Don't rule out the tray because it looks unchanged. A worn pocket can let the housing sit differently while its top still looks level.

10points
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Same retained housing twists in two pockets. Photos show one finger touching first, not why yet.

10points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

One contact first is worth following. Show the fitted pads against the drawing before calling it arm drift. Another pickup correction could make that crooked contact look less obvious without fixing it.

13points
RO
RosaBell0640
Replying to JuliaAdams0152

Were the pads issued as a pair?

0points
MA
Marcus_Bowen
Replying to RosaBell0640

Our spare pad once had the correct face but a different backing thickness. It came from another repair. The part number on its bag looked reassuring until we measured the assembly.

7points
JA
JamieBrooks0817
Replying to Marcus_Bowen

Marcus, was the difference on the drawing or only on the thing in your hand? I ask because a wrong drawing can produce a very convincing inspection result.

13points
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Replying to RosaBell0640

Stores found separate issue dates. Maintenance has taken the pad assemblies for comparison; lesson postponed.

6points
HA
HazelAdams0136
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Compare the mounting faces too. The pad thickness alone won't tell you where its working face ends up.

11points
MA
Marcus_Bowen
Replying to JamieBrooks0817

It was on the earlier repair drawing, Jamie. We had compared the loose contact face with the current drawing and missed the backing. Our mistake was choosing too small a piece to compare.

10points
AN
AnikaChan1117
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

And my tray suggestion still needs checking, but Gavin has a better lead now. No point defending a guess just because I posted it first.

17points
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Replying to HazelAdams0136

Found it. Replacement pad has a taller backing than this tool drawing permits. Tray contacts checked out.

6points
RO
RosaBell0640
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Is the replacement pair actually in stores?

11points
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Replying to RosaBell0640

Yes, checked pair fitted by maintenance. The retained housing now closes square in both pockets.

22points
GA
Gavin_Briggs
Replying to RosaBell0640

Thanks Rosa. Checking what we owned saved another speculative pad order.

24points
NA
NadiaAllen0291
Replying to Gavin_Briggs

Have maintenance reconcile those saved pickup corrections before the teaching job goes back into use

11points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .