How do I check our FR10 spacer grip without adding another compensation?

HazelCarter1006 · 2 Mar 2026, 18:09 UTC

Reply to discussion
HA
HazelCarter1006
Our rigid spacer is square in the tray, then turns as the grip takes over. Saved pickup edits keep multiplying. Which fitted contacts should maintenance compare before we blame the arm?

15 replies

AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Was square in the tray measured or just watched?

6 points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to AmaraArcher0426

Watched. Fair question. I've asked maintenance to verify tray seating and the actual spacer contacts against the intended arrangement before treating that first impression as a result.

12 points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Check the complete finger assembly too. Pads, backing pieces and mounting matter. If one side was changed recently, compare what is actually fitted rather than accepting the replacement label as proof.

18 points
AI
AishaCarter1040
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Are the two fitted pads the specified pair?

13 points
AA
AaronBrown0871
Replying to HazelCarter1006

And inspect the identified spacers themselves. A change in their contact geometry can look like a grip problem even when the tray and fingers match their drawings.

23 points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to AishaCarter1040

Tray location and spacer dimensions checked correctly. Pads have the intended references, Aisha, but one sits farther forward than its assembled drawing position. Maintenance is checking the mounting beneath it.

3 points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to HazelCarter1006

That's the useful discrepancy. Don't start filing the pad to make the contact match before the mounting difference is understood.

19 points
AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to HazelCarter1006

What was under it?

19 points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to AmaraArcher0426

A backing shim from an earlier repair. Not in the current assembly drawing. Maintenance found the repair note, but no record that this arrangement was accepted for our present spacer job.

7 points
AI
AishaCarter1040
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Who defines the restored assembly?

2 points
AA
AaronBrown0871
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Have tooling and maintenance settle that from the current job requirements, with controls reviewing the compensating edits alongside it. An old repair note may explain why the shim exists without making it applicable here.

6 points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to AaronBrown0871

Tooling confirmed the current specified assembly and maintenance restored it. Controls reviewed the edits before the controlled handling comparison. Pickup, transfer and release now pass with the identified spacer range.

15 points
HA
HazelCarter1006
Replying to AishaCarter1040

Aisha, maintenance owns the restored assembly record with tooling's confirmation. The older repair arrangement is marked inapplicable to this job, not left as an alternative instruction.

20 points
AM
AmaraArcher0426
Replying to HazelCarter1006

Did the covering operator try it too?

10 points
JU
JuliaAdams0152
Replying to HazelCarter1006

And leave the original observation corrected in the handover: you initially thought the tray was square, then verified it. The measured check is the useful starting point for the next investigation.

6 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.