Our UR5e inspection proposal has acquired a rather portable scratch. The original photograph marks a short defect beside a hole, but a training crop cuts the hole off and points at a bright reflection instead. I have kept the physical cover and asked quality to mark the actual defect again; meanwhile people are using both images as equivalent references.
The reject arrow moves when somebody crops our cover photo
BrunoArcher0365 · 8 Mar 2026, 06:59 UTC
1 reply
Replying to BrunoArcher0365
We had a weld photograph where cropping removed the only feature that showed which end we were discussing. Keep the full view linked to any detail, and withdraw that misleading crop now. There is no benefit in letting a known bad reference circulate while lighting work continues.
1pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .