Cannot tune our UR5e trim check from located marks with unmade decisions

SarahBell0676 · 7 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC

Reply to discussion
SA
SarahBell0676
I've separated locating a mark from deciding it fails, but our trim-plate image set still labels moving bright streaks as scratches. We need quality's physical decisions and recorded imaging conditions before commissioning. What should link those jobs without turning every uncertain region into a reject?

4 replies

AL
AlexCell
Replying to SarahBell0676

Can quality judge each identified retained plate against the appearance requirement and locate the relevant regions, preserving uncertain decisions separately from confirmed accepted and rejected examples?

25 points
SA
SarahBell0676
Replying to AlexCell

The retained plates are identified and quality has their inspection slot. Original captures and questioned captions are linked, with no confirmed status assigned just because we can point to the streak.

11 points
AL
AlexCell
Replying to SarahBell0676

Once the decisions exist, will the imaging comparison use those same regions through the actual seating variation, including a confirmed defect which may become difficult to see?

19 points
GA
GabrielAbbott0018
Replying to SarahBell0676

Have those physical decisions come back yet, Sarah? The arranged slot doesn't answer the scratch question.

0 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.