Catalogue outline only. Our fixture drawing is current, but nobody has surveyed the parked door against it. I will ask for that installed geometry to be included.

Bring the setter to that survey. I have been asking the same thing on our own proposal: the space the arm wants may also be the space needed to remove the fixture.

Can your tooling person supply a dimensioned outline of the complete gripper holding the blank before anyone orders the arm?

Yes, the tooling supplier can provide the proposed adapter, gripper, fingers and held-blank outline. Connections are not yet laid out. I've made that omission visible in the request.

Include the relevant loaded-tool data as well. Even an assembly that fits geometrically still needs checking against the robot limits for the intended movement, with its centre of gravity and inertia considered.

Theo, agreed. But keep the access drawing legible for the setter too. They should not need to find ordinary fixture-change space buried in a payload assessment.

Separate checks, same proposed assembly. Clara, has anyone assessed the loaded exit and empty return, or only the pose at the fixture?

Only the fixture pose. The integrator now has both paths in the requested review, with the door and connections included. No result yet, and the arm choice remains open.

The setter also needs the fixture lifting point accessible during changeover. That came out of our discussion, Luis; it was not marked on the supplier's outline. Thanks for bringing them into it early.

If the review proposes moving the base, will that lifting access remain a requirement in the revised layout?