Already know to retain bad imaging conditions as challenge cases, not tuning truth. My new FR10 bezel references have moving bright streaks labelled scratches. Before commissioning, who should settle the physical labels and how do I connect that decision to repeatable presentation?
Unverified scratch labels on our FR10 bezel examples
JasperChan1073 · 27 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC
3 replies
Replying to JasperChan1073
Has the person responsible for accepting the bezel examined the same identified pieces independently of these camera images? That gives you a physical decision to connect to the presentation record, rather than asking the imaging setup to certify its own labels.
20pointsReplying to NadiaCarter0987
Not these pieces. Quality has agreed to examine them, but no labels confirmed yet. I've separated the suspect images and kept their part identities and presentation notes; tuning remains on hold.
20pointsReplying to JasperChan1073
After that examination, retain examples of acceptable surfaces as well as confirmed defects. Ask imaging to demonstrate repeatable interpretation of those identified pieces under the agreed conditions; a single attractive image will not establish the reference set.
13pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.