LouisArcher0398 · 26 Mar 2026, 07:24 UTC
Find when the sleeve first leans in the retained footage, then compare the identified sleeve, source contacts and complete fitted fingers with their intended geometry. Preserve those edits so the programmer can review them against what maintenance actually finds.
6 pointsLeans at closure. Looks seated beforehand. Retained sleeve and finger assembly references are with maintenance.
8 pointsLooks seated from which side? One front view can hide a corner resting high. I'd want the actual contact check before choosing between tray and fingers.
4 pointsFront view only. I haven't established the hidden contact. Good question.
1 pointsHave them include that source seat in the static comparison. The first visible lean at closing does not prove the sleeve reached its intended contacts beforehand; closure may simply make the earlier seating problem obvious.
17 pointsMaintenance found debris under one removable source support. It sat high at the hidden end.
10 pointsUseful find. Compare the restored support and both finger contacts before spending money on a replacement gripper. The crooked pickup wasn't an invoice request.
1 pointsSupport restored and intended contacts checked. Programmer has the edits. Full transfer repeat still due.
12 pointsKeep the hidden support check in the maintenance handover, with the accepted seating detail. The repair is identified; the completed transfer comparison will be the next evidence, rather than another reassuring front-view photograph.
0 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.