Cannot choose our FR10 panel tool from one seal on the bench

ZaraBrown0917 · 12 Dec 2025, 04:13 UTC

Closed
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Our FR10 proposal starts with a flexible cover panel already separated from its stack. The supplier proved a seal. I still cannot tell how it keeps the panel supported or delivers only one.

18 replies

AM
AmaraCarter1035
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Ask them to show the stack preparation and complete panel transfer in the proposal, including the receiving tray; their bench seal leaves several actual jobs without an owner.

25 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to AmaraCarter1035

They say an operator will separate the panels. That was not in the quotation, and our operator already covers another bench.

17 points
HA
HassanBaker0443
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Can that person prepare a full representative order without abandoning the other bench, or is the plan quietly borrowing another pair of hands?

10 points
HE
HenryBaker0438
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

What supports the panel between the cups during the proposed movement?

11 points
SA
SamBennett0768
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

And ask who separated the demonstration sample, because that preparation may be rather more careful than ordinary incoming panels receive.

22 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to SamBennett0768

Henry, nothing else is shown. Sam, the demonstrator separated the sample by hand. Hassan, I have not measured our operator doing that work yet.

-2 points
AM
AmaraCarter1035
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

So keep manual preparation as a costed option, not a free assumption; it still leaves Henry's support question, even if one person can reliably separate every panel.

15 points
HA
HassanBaker0443
Replying to AmaraCarter1035

Yes. I'm not against a manual step, I'm against assigning it to someone already busy and then saying the robot freed them up.

7 points
HE
HenryBaker0438
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Does the receiving tray support the panel before the tool releases it?

11 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to HenryBaker0438

The current drawing stops with the panel above the tray. I have asked for the landing, support and release sequence, not just another view of the cups.

23 points
SA
SamBennett0768
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

A useful place for the tray designer to join the discussion, since the panel has to arrive in a shape that the tray can actually receive.

23 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to SamBennett0768

Tray designer is joining. The tool supplier is also proposing a single-panel check, but has supplied only a sensor description so far.

18 points
AM
AmaraCarter1035
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Ask what that check can distinguish and what happens when it cannot decide; naming a sensor does not tell your operator what to do with a suspect pickup.

22 points
HE
HenryBaker0438
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Has anyone assessed ordinary panel variation in that proposed check?

12 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to HenryBaker0438

Not yet, Henry. We have retained panels from two incoming stacks for the review, including the ones that were awkward to separate. No trial result.

20 points
HA
HassanBaker0443
Replying to ZaraBrown0917

Zara, will the preparation comparison include putting those awkward panels somewhere and getting the next stack, rather than just timing the easy separations?

22 points
SA
SamBennett0768
Replying to HassanBaker0443

Hassan, yes, that is the bit I would put beside the supplier's preparation claim before accepting an operator-time estimate.

9 points
ZA
ZaraBrown0917
Replying to HassanBaker0443

Both are included in the study request. I've left the staffing saving blank until we measure it, and the tool choice open until support, release and single-panel handling are reviewed.

6 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .