ImranAbbott0044 · 18 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC
Time acquisition, decoding, display publication and logging separately using a monotonic clock, with the timing recorder kept out of the suspected slow write path.
25 pointsCan you compare the same diagnostic replay with detailed logging disabled?
9 pointsThe paired replay points to file writing: acquisition timing stays similar, while display publication waits behind long writes with detailed logging enabled. I've retained the timings rather than call the controller offline.
19 pointsDoes the screen reveal that its last reading is ageing during the wait?
12 pointsNot clearly enough. I'm adding a separate freshness indication. The developer is moving optional detailed recording off the publication path with a bounded queue, but we haven't agreed its overload behaviour yet.
20 pointsAgree which records may be omitted and how omissions or write failures are reported before calling the queue a fix; bounded memory without visible data loss would leave another misleading diagnostic record.
2 pointsThe revised bench test keeps display updates responsive when the writer is delayed, and reports omitted optional detail when the queue fills. Storage failure is visible separately from stale readings. The normal-launch check and maintenance handover remain to be done.
15 pointsDid the test cover a writer that never catches up, not only a short delay?
14 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.