Connector inserts that fit the wrong way round

JonasBarnes0546 · 19 Feb 2026, 23:56 UTC

Closed
JO
JonasBarnes0546
I put the two proposed FR10 connector inserts beside the quotation and could barely tell them apart. Either appears to fit the carrier backwards. Before I buy the tooling, I want a changeover check that connects the installed insert with the selected recipe. A larger printed name would help me, but would not stop the wrong combination.

16 replies

HA
HazelChan1093
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

On a fixture I inherited, the big label stayed with the carrier while the small insert changed. Everyone could read the label perfectly. Put the identification on the bit that actually changes, and ask the designer whether reversal can be physically prevented.

8 points
JO
JonasBarnes0546
Replying to HazelChan1093

That is exactly where the proposed label sits. The inserts have separate part numbers on the drawing but no permanent identification in the quote.

18 points
TH
ThomasCarter0973
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

Can the reversed insert actually seat on all its intended contacts, or does it just go into the opening?

9 points
JO
JonasBarnes0546
Replying to ThomasCarter0973

It goes into the opening. I have not checked all the contacts, so fully seated backwards was too strong a description.

4 points
HA
HazelChan1093
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

Then ask tooling to demonstrate the difference. A label won't explain a partly seated insert to someone who thinks it is home because the top looks level.

17 points
LU
LuisAbbott0086
Replying to HazelChan1093

The handover needs an answer for an unreadable or missing identity too. On our inspection screens the awkward cases became workarounds because the happy path was the only one anyone had explained.

-5 points
CA
CarlaChan1097
Replying to LuisAbbott0086

Also removal after a valid selection. Does the draft retain permission when the insert is taken out? That matters even if the same insert is returned.

15 points
TH
ThomasCarter0973
Replying to LuisAbbott0086

Luis, who is meant to settle an unreadable identity in your example, rather than just telling the operator to call someone?

9 points
LU
LuisAbbott0086
Replying to ThomasCarter0973

Our shift lead owns that first review, with quality deciding uncertain item disposition and maintenance handling the tooling fault. For Jonas's insert, those names should come from his own tooling and controls handover, not be borrowed from mine.

12 points
JO
JonasBarnes0546
Replying to CarlaChan1097

Designer checked the samples: the reversed insert catches a shoulder before reaching its locating faces. They propose an asymmetric locating feature to make that obstruction obvious, plus an insert identity read that must agree with the recipe. The current software draft retains the old confirmation after removal.

5 points
CA
CarlaChan1097
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

Removal needs to invalidate that confirmation. Has the programmer included power interruption between identification and the next job in the proposed checks?

18 points
HA
HazelChan1093
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

I like making the wrong orientation impossible to seat, but don't let that replace the family check. Your other insert may be the right way round and still entirely wrong for the connector.

10 points
JO
JonasBarnes0546
Replying to CarlaChan1097

Both are in the review. The programmer has added interruption after selection, then requires the fitted insert and recipe to be checked again. Tooling is keeping the family identification separate from the anti-reversal feature.

22 points
TH
ThomasCarter0973
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

Will the shift lead see why it refused, or just get a red box?

4 points
JO
JonasBarnes0546
Replying to ThomasCarter0973

The offline screen now distinguishes absent, unreadable and wrong-family identity, and the restart exercise no longer keeps the previous confirmation. Our shift lead could follow each case to the named contact. Prototype insert is still being made, so I have approved that prototype stage only.

5 points
CA
CarlaChan1097
Replying to JonasBarnes0546

Keep a partly seated correct-family insert in the physical checks. A successful identity read must not stand in for confirmation of the required seating.

24 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .