Why does our FR5 unloading sketch make the door disappear?

JoBrown0940 · 17 Aug 2025, 11:32 UTC

Closed
JO
JoBrown0940
Our brass blank fits the reach sketch. Gripper and open machine door aren't drawn. How am I meant to compare arms from that?

18 replies

FE
FelixChan1067
Replying to JoBrown0940

Ask for the complete tool holding the blank, with the actual open-door position and fixture geometry. The review should follow the approach, grip and withdrawal, since reaching one point does not describe unloading.

18 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to FelixChan1067

Door is from a catalogue drawing. Ours has an extra handle. Tool model is available but wasn't used.

6 points
FE
FelixChan1067
Replying to JoBrown0940

Have the machine owner confirm the door and handle geometry against the installed machine, then give the reviewer the full tool model. I would keep the proposed mounting position provisional until those are combined.

12 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to FelixChan1067

Setter can help with the survey. Base order is waiting.

21 points
HA
HanaAdams0100
Replying to JoBrown0940

Will that survey include where the setter puts the removed fixture, Jo?

15 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to HanaAdams0100

Yes. There's a trolley beside the door already. I'll get its working space marked.

0 points
FE
FelixChan1067
Replying to JoBrown0940

Include access to the fixture while it is still in the machine too. The trolley destination matters, but the setter has to get the fixture out in the first place.

13 points
AI
AishaBarnes0605
Replying to JoBrown0940

Which tool model did you find? Check its assembly reference against the current offer before spending the survey on an older set of fingers.

-1 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to AishaBarnes0605

Assembly G2, matching the current offer. Survey found the open handle across the proposed tool approach.

11 points
IM
ImranAli0218
Replying to JoBrown0940

Any alternative proposed yet, or just the clash identified?

13 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to ImranAli0218

Integrator is comparing a different approach orientation. No new base position proposed yet.

7 points
FE
FelixChan1067
Replying to JoBrown0940

Have the toolmaker check that orientation with the held brass blank and the service connections included. A clear jaw tip would not be enough to settle this one.

14 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to FelixChan1067

They found the hose fitting was missing from G2's exported view. Corrected assembly sent for review.

22 points
AI
AishaBarnes0605
Replying to JoBrown0940

Was the fitting in the assembly but hidden on export, or absent from the assembly itself? I'd check what the earlier assessment actually used.

9 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to AishaBarnes0605

Hidden on export, Aisha. Earlier reviewer never saw it. Revised route review remains open; stand still not ordered.

10 points
HA
HanaAdams0100
Replying to JoBrown0940

And does the setter still have that trolley space under the revised approach?

14 points
JO
JoBrown0940
Replying to HanaAdams0100

Trolley space unchanged on the drawing. Setter wants to review the whole changeover before agreeing. Thanks Hana, keeping that question alive.

5 points
IM
ImranAli0218
Replying to JoBrown0940

Please post what they decide. Curious whether the orientation change survives the complete tool.

7 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .