Our bracket acceptance sheet starts after the correction station

BethCarter1020 · 2 Sept 2025, 21:31 UTC

Closed
BE
BethCarter1020
The UR5e bracket proposal has a very good acceptance rate, according to a sheet completed after correction. The earlier jig notes say aligned under clamp and nothing measurable after release. I want the fixture review to explain the work between those two records before someone deletes the correction station from the layout. Where would you start with this paperwork?

16 replies

WI
WillBarnes0574
Replying to BethCarter1020

Find whether the route identifies which brackets went through correction and what was checked before it. Keep the current layout allowance while those stages are being separated.

12points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to WillBarnes0574

The traveller sends the whole batch to that station. No individual correction marks. Final sheet is drawing D, and it doesn't say whether every bracket needed work.

12points
WI
WillBarnes0574
Replying to BethCarter1020

Ask the station operator what the route instruction meant in practice. Passing through a station may mean inspection with correction as needed, rather than correction on every part.

20points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to BethCarter1020

Is the old checking fixture still available?

15points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to CalebBennett0754

Yes, Caleb. Its label says C. Current bracket drawing is D. I've asked inspection whether C is its own gauge revision or refers to the part drawing.

17points
LE
LeoChan1058
Replying to BethCarter1020

Worth asking. A letter on a gauge need not match the component revision, but its intended check does need to cover the relevant drawing requirement.

4points
WI
WillBarnes0574
Replying to WillBarnes0574

Did the operator explain the correction step? That would help planning avoid assuming either every bracket or no bracket needed it.

5points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to WillBarnes0574

He checked every bracket and corrected some flange angles. No count retained. The good final sheet won't give us that missing labour figure, however long we stare at it.

11points
AN
AnikaBell0682
Replying to BethCarter1020

Who owns that labour allowance while the current process is being established?

5points
WI
WillBarnes0574
Replying to BethCarter1020

A current trial can record inspected and corrected quantities separately, alongside incoming fit-up and untouched released dimensions. That would give the estimator something usable without inventing the old rate.

7points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to WillBarnes0574

Anika, production engineering owns the allowance. Will, fabrication and inspection are writing that trial. Tooling won't be approved on the old final sheet alone.

23points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to BethCarter1020

Any answer about the C label?

15points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to CalebBennett0754

C is the gauge revision. Inspection confirmed it was checked against part drawing D. Its result is still after any correction, so that doesn't fill the earlier measurement gap.

11points
LE
LeoChan1058
Replying to BethCarter1020

That settles the label question. Will the new trial also capture the component revisions and their condition before fit-up? Otherwise it may compare a new assembly with the old route in name only.

16points
BE
BethCarter1020
Replying to LeoChan1058

Yes. Current component revisions are listed in the draft, with fit-up and released checks separate. No trial results yet. The correction station stays in our provisional floor plan.

13points
AN
AnikaBell0682
Replying to BethCarter1020

Sensible place to leave it while there is still work to measure.

9points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .