Our FR5 bracket acknowledgement matches a reused name, not an attempt

HanaBell0622 · 3 Jan 2026, 01:17 UTC

Closed
HA
HanaBell0622
The application restarted and reused the bracket job name. Three clocks disagree. Which attempt owns the later acknowledgement?

4 replies

OL
OliverChen1146
Replying to HanaBell0622

Keep the source logs in their own order and mark the restart boundary, then ask the interface owner which attempt or session identifiers survive; don't assign the acknowledgement by whichever clock happens to make the story tidy

19 points
HA
HanaBell0622
Replying to OliverChen1146

Originals retained. Application attempts differ, but the acknowledgement exposes only the reused name. No match established.

17 points
HA
HassanBarnes0530
Replying to HanaBell0622

Could the technical contact investigate the timeout with that receipt explicitly unassigned, Hana? Waiting for a perfect match may hold up the useful questions if the identifying evidence no longer exists

22 points
OL
OliverChen1146
Replying to HassanBarnes0530

And keep the bracket's quality disposition separate from that software reconstruction; an acknowledgement whose meaning and owner remain uncertain should not become the inspection result by default

-5 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .