AishaAllen0344 · 5 Feb 2026, 05:38 UTC
Ask them to identify the demonstrated set and explain the substitution against your agreed tooling list.
6 pointsI've sent the list and the trial frame together now, with the recess circled on both sets, because their first answer didn't even acknowledge a change.
0 pointsA different recess could be harmless or important. You don't know yet. I'd avoid arguing from the photograph that the new fingers cannot work; ask them to establish what changed and show the agreed handling with that actual set.
19 pointsThey acknowledge a revised set now and say the recess is for another sample size, but our sample trial used the smaller inspection pieces, so I've asked them to address those rather than the extra capability.
3 pointsExtra capability is an odd answer when the agreed job hasn't been shown. Include placement and release in the request, Aisha. Fingers which hold your small piece but don't let it enter the inspection nest would be a fairly expensive party trick.
13 pointsHas the installer received that revised-set identity too? They'll need it before the tooling review resumes.
23 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .