Cannot assign the FR10 acknowledgement after our application restart

Gabriel, label only in the application display. Sam, original files are untouched.

Look at what the receiver actually returned, not just the display. On another interface discussion the important question was what the receiver retained, and a friendly label on the slide did not answer it.

Grace, would you use connection loss as a common event, or is that too loose?

It can bound part of the sequence, but different components may detect the loss at different times. I would not align their clocks on that event alone, especially when a timeout is involved.

That's helpful, Grace. I was about to use the two disconnect entries as though they were simultaneous.

The raw reply has a sequence field. Our display hides it. Thank you, Anil.

Now check what the request carried and whether that sequence can repeat after restart. Finding another number is useful; it isn't the match until its meaning is clear.

Hassan, does the saved request include that field too?

Yes. Different values on the two sends.

If the protocol defines the returned field as the request sequence, compare those saved values directly. Keep the protocol meaning with the report, since an unrelated internal counter could look equally convincing.

Anil, would you still compare the controller events once a request match is found?

Yes, Sam, for what the controller was doing. A matched acknowledgement may only say the request arrived. Don't turn it into a completed inspection unless that is what the interface says it means.

Protocol says request received, with its sequence echoed. It matches the earlier send.

So is the newer attempt still unanswered, Hassan?

For the handover, keep the earlier receipt beside the earlier request and show the later attempt separately. Any eventual inspection result needs its own interpretation; the receipt should not fill that blank.

Newer receipt unknown, Gabriel. Neither inspection outcome is established from this reply.

Did the application treat that earlier receipt as success for the newer attempt, or only display it?