Dispatch does move incomplete pallets at order end. Packaging has the current contents specification and deck drawing; tooling has the open-hand envelope. Neither has returned a finding yet, so I am keeping the current pattern undecided.

Use one identified layout for those findings, including placement order. A packaging answer from the complete top view and a tool animation of another sequence do not form a combined result.

Who is allowed to release an incomplete pallet for movement?

That responsibility matters, but it cannot replace the support assessment. Define the permitted partial configurations first; the release role needs criteria it can actually apply

Packaging returned an objection to the rotated row on the current pallet. Designer offers aligned rows at lower count. Dispatch lead owns release, but that candidate's partial arrangements and extra pallet movements still need review.

Has the lower-count candidate's support been checked, or is lower count being treated as automatically better?

Vera's question is important. More empty space can help the hand while removing support a carton relied on, so the new count needs its own packaging finding.

And send the changed row positions to tooling. Approval attached to the old path won't describe the new last placement or finger exit.

The aligned candidate now has packaging approval for its defined filled-carton full and partial arrangements. Tool model review found the last release obstructed by a neighbour. We haven't selected a physical correction.

Can the placement order change while leaving the approved final arrangement intact? Worth comparing before replacing the hand, though every intermediate occupied state still needs checking.

Yes, compare it. Do not ask packaging to approve a finger gap by silently shifting a carton out of its reviewed bearing position.

Integrator is comparing the revised order without moving the final carton positions. Dispatch's work estimate already includes the additional pallet movements. Geometry result still pending; original rotated row remains rejected.

What will the shift see while the candidate is unfinished? I would keep it out of the released loading sheets, even if it is the only option still being developed

Released sheets are unchanged and this automation pattern remains on hold. Review copies identify the aligned candidate as unfinished. Thanks, Caleb; our planner had been about to circulate the candidate picture without its outstanding release check.