I cannot choose the FR5 cap proposal from two different starting trays

YasminBrown0876 · 10 May 2026, 08:51 UTC

Reply to discussion
YA
YasminBrown0876
Our workshop tray needs the caps orienting; the other demo starts after that work, so I'm comparing a handling job with a presentation somebody prepared off camera. What common test would be worth paying for?

17 replies

FA
FarahAbbott0069
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Ask both to start with your incoming tray. Or price their proposed preparation explicitly.

21 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to FarahAbbott0069

The tidy-tray supplier wants a dedicated insert, filled manually; I've asked for a full-order comparison including that work rather than another close-up of the fast pickup.

8 points
VI
VictorBrooks0794
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Who fills it while the packer does the current job?

18 points
JA
JaneCarter1032
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Define the receiving condition too. What must a successfully placed cap look like, and who judges the result? The preparation allowance will not answer that.

3 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to JaneCarter1032

Same packer, Victor, so their existing work stays in the timing; Jane, each cap must seat in our assembly nest, with the assembly lead judging placement and release.

19 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to YasminBrown0876

I'd include an ordinary tray exchange, not just a long run from a freshly set tray. That's often where the covering person discovers the demonstration quietly relied on someone else.

19 points
FA
FarahAbbott0069
Replying to TobyBaker0492

And a partly filled tray. Our orders don't politely finish at the last pocket.

7 points
VI
VictorBrooks0794
Replying to TobyBaker0492

Toby, exactly. Include who clears the unused caps, not just who brings the next tray.

-6 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to FarahAbbott0069

The first repeat is back: dedicated insert gives consistent seating, but manual preparation and clearing partials use almost all the order saving. Other candidate's original tray still needs an intervention at one corner.

12 points
JA
JaneCarter1032
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Was that corner intervention included in its reported result? It needs to remain visible if they propose a correction and repeat the comparison.

11 points
FA
FarahAbbott0069
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Nearly no saving is still an answer. What problem would the new insert solve for you?

9 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to JaneCarter1032

Fewer awkward reaches, mainly, but our manual bench can be rearranged cheaply; Jane, the corner intervention is in the report and the supplier is proposing a tray locator correction.

4 points
TO
TobyBaker0492
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Could the bench change remove those reaches without adding the insert preparation? I'd give that option the same packer's walkthrough before deciding the little saving is worth the machinery.

8 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to TobyBaker0492

We've tried the bench arrangement with the packer and it removes the awkward reach; the automation comparison now needs another benefit to justify its cost, not just a nicer pickup video.

19 points
VI
VictorBrooks0794
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Then don't buy it out of embarrassment at having spent time comparing it.

13 points
YA
YasminBrown0876
Replying to VictorBrooks0794

We aren't buying for this order; manual bench change is staying, and the supplier's tray correction can wait until a larger repeat job makes another comparison worthwhile.

21 points
FA
FarahAbbott0069
Replying to YasminBrown0876

Useful decision. Did you retain the intervention clip for that later comparison?

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.