Our workshop tray needs the caps orienting; the other demo starts after that work, so I'm comparing a handling job with a presentation somebody prepared off camera. What common test would be worth paying for?
The tidy-tray supplier wants a dedicated insert, filled manually; I've asked for a full-order comparison including that work rather than another close-up of the fast pickup.
Define the receiving condition too. What must a successfully placed cap look like, and who judges the result? The preparation allowance will not answer that.
Same packer, Victor, so their existing work stays in the timing; Jane, each cap must seat in our assembly nest, with the assembly lead judging placement and release.
I'd include an ordinary tray exchange, not just a long run from a freshly set tray. That's often where the covering person discovers the demonstration quietly relied on someone else.
The first repeat is back: dedicated insert gives consistent seating, but manual preparation and clearing partials use almost all the order saving. Other candidate's original tray still needs an intervention at one corner.
Fewer awkward reaches, mainly, but our manual bench can be rearranged cheaply; Jane, the corner intervention is in the report and the supplier is proposing a tray locator correction.
Could the bench change remove those reaches without adding the insert preparation? I'd give that option the same packer's walkthrough before deciding the little saving is worth the machinery.
We've tried the bench arrangement with the packer and it removes the awkward reach; the automation comparison now needs another benefit to justify its cost, not just a nicer pickup video.
We aren't buying for this order; manual bench change is staying, and the supplier's tray correction can wait until a larger repeat job makes another comparison worthwhile.